Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ncfu.ru/handle/20.500.12258/16023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolldobler, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T13:41:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-16T13:41:30Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationDietz Saldanha E.-A., Holldobler S., Pereira L.M. Our themes on abduction in human reasoning: a synopsis // Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. - 2021. - Том 59. - Pages 279 - 293ru
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12258/16023-
dc.description.abstractPsychological experiments have shown that humans do not reason according to classical logic. Therefore, we might argue that logic-based approaches in general are not suitable for modeling human reasoning. Yet, we take a different view and are convinced that logic can help us as an underlying formalization of a cognitive theory, but claim rather that classical logic is not adequate for this purpose. In this chapter we investigate abduction and its link to human reasoning. In particular we discuss three different variations we have explored and show how they can be adequately modeled within a novel computational and integrated, cognitive theory, the Weak Completion Semanticsru
dc.language.isoenru
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHru
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics-
dc.subjectHuman reasoningru
dc.subjectPsychological experimentsru
dc.titleOur themes on abduction in human reasoning: a synopsisru
dc.typeСтатьяru
vkr.instИнститут математики и информационных технологий имени профессора Н.И. Червяковаru
Appears in Collections:Статьи, проиндексированные в SCOPUS, WOS

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
scopusresults 1747 .pdf
  Restricted Access
64.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.