Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ncfu.ru/handle/20.500.12258/18269
Title: Ideology and utopia: The national state structure of the ussr (presented on the example of the north caucasus territories)
Authors: Nevskaya, T. A.
Невская, Т. А.
Keywords: Autonomy;Types of ethnic communities;Cossacks;Culture;Ethnos;Highlanders;Marxist theory;Nations;North Caucasus;Remnants;Selfdetermination;Social development;The mountainous republic of the Northern Caucasus;Stateterritorial structure
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: International University Seminar for Balkan Studies and Specialization
Citation: Nevskaya, T., Kondrasheva, A. Ideology and utopia: The national state structure of the ussr (presented on the example of the north caucasus territories) // Balkanistic Forum. - Том 30. - Выпуск 3. - Стр.: 288 - 302. - DOI10.37708/bf.swu.v30i3.16
Series/Report no.: Balkanistic Forum
Abstract: The model of the national-state and territorial structure of the USSR was implemented in strict accordance with the Marxist-Leninist theory of socioeconomic formations. According to this theory, every society goes through several stages of development: the primitive system, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and communism. This is a naturally progressive process. Based on the works of Engels, Soviet scientists created a theory of the development of ethnic communities. Each formation had to correspond to a certain type of ethnic group. Guided by the "right of nations to self-determination," each nation was to receive its own statehood. This model existed before the collapse of the USSR. Since the 1980s it began to crumble, various ethnic groups, or rather their elites, were dissatisfied with their status. The autonomous regions of the North Caucasus began to transform into republics. The republics wanted to get the status of an ally. Administrative transformations did not improve the economy and living standards but on the contrary, led to increased bureaucratic growth. However, National Societies believed that the key was to appoint “their own” (a person with whom they had an established relationship and understanding) boss. Different peoples within the same autonomy often clashed. At the end of the twentieth-century tensions grew in the North Caucasus. It became obvious that the formation of territorial units along ethnic lines did not justify itself, however, this structure is preserved at the present time due to the fear of destabilization of the situation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12258/18269
Appears in Collections:Статьи, проиндексированные в SCOPUS, WOS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
scopusresults 1923 .pdf
  Restricted Access
64.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
WoS 1269 .pdf
  Restricted Access
84.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.