Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ncfu.ru/handle/20.500.12258/25832
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolldobler, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T12:30:28Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-22T12:30:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationBhadra, M., Hamada, I., Hölldobler, S., Pereira, L.M. Humans Reason Skeptically // Handbook of Abductive Cognition. - 2023. - pp. 797-832. - DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_38ru
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12258/25832-
dc.description.abstractThe weak completion semantics is a novel cognitive theory. It is multi-valued, non-monotonic, and knowledge-rich, allows learning, can handle inconsistent background knowledge, and can be applied to model the average reasoner. Moreover, it uses abduction to explain observations, to satisfy integrity constraints, and to search for counterexamples. In all these applications, human reasoning tasks can only be adequately modeled within the weak completion semantics if skeptical abduction rather than credulous abduction is applied. This will be illustrated in the context of the suppression task, disjunctive reasoning, and conditional reasoning.ru
dc.language.isoenru
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHandbook of Abductive Cognition-
dc.subjectSkeptical abductionru
dc.subjectWeak completion semanticsru
dc.subjectConditional reasoningru
dc.subjectDisjunctive reasoningru
dc.subjectHuman reasoningru
dc.subjectInference tasksru
dc.subjectNon-monotonic reasoningru
dc.subjectSuppression taskru
dc.titleHumans Reason Skepticallyru
dc.typeСтатьяru
vkr.instИнститут цифрового развитияru
Appears in Collections:Статьи, проиндексированные в SCOPUS, WOS

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
scopusresults 2826 .pdf
  Restricted Access
132.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.