Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.ncfu.ru/handle/20.500.12258/16023| Title: | Our themes on abduction in human reasoning: a synopsis |
| Authors: | Holldobler, S. |
| Keywords: | Human reasoning;Psychological experiments |
| Issue Date: | 2021 |
| Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH |
| Citation: | Dietz Saldanha E.-A., Holldobler S., Pereira L.M. Our themes on abduction in human reasoning: a synopsis // Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. - 2021. - Том 59. - Pages 279 - 293 |
| Series/Report no.: | Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics |
| Abstract: | Psychological experiments have shown that humans do not reason according to classical logic. Therefore, we might argue that logic-based approaches in general are not suitable for modeling human reasoning. Yet, we take a different view and are convinced that logic can help us as an underlying formalization of a cognitive theory, but claim rather that classical logic is not adequate for this purpose. In this chapter we investigate abduction and its link to human reasoning. In particular we discuss three different variations we have explored and show how they can be adequately modeled within a novel computational and integrated, cognitive theory, the Weak Completion Semantics |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12258/16023 |
| Appears in Collections: | Статьи, проиндексированные в SCOPUS, WOS |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| scopusresults 1747 .pdf Restricted Access | 64.33 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.